View From The Jury Box

View from the Jury Boxaround his neck, not breathing or moving, had turned
pale blue. The Apgar scale, used by doctors to
During jury selection for a medical malpractice caseevaluate a newborn baby’s general condition,
tried in New York State Supreme Court (Queenswas 2 (out of a possible 10) at one minute after birth,
division), I asked a lot of questions—in hopes thatand 3 at five minutes. Intervention by members of the
this would disqualify me from consideration.hospital’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
I had heard that lawyers usually don’t likebrought steady improvement to Nicholas’s vital
potential jurors who ask “too many”signs. They stabilized his Apgar at 8 (normal). Mother
questions. Questions might cause them to revealand baby were routinely discharged from the hospital
something they would prefer not to or cause othertwo days later without further incident.
jurors to start asking questions. To my surprise, I wasAfter the plaintiffs completed their case, Citrin began
chosen to be on the jury. As I would find out later, Ihis defense of Stern and LIJ. He dealt first with
was selected because I asked so many questions.whether Stern had deviated from accepted medical
My two previous jury experiences had been onpractice in managing Caputo’s labor and
criminal cases, which, understandably, created a moredelivery. Citrin called other OB/GYN physicans, who
serious, weighty atmosphere for jurors. However, thetestified that, based on the fetal heart monitor strip,
entire process in the Caputo civil case (jury selection,Stern made a medically acceptable decision to permit
accessibility of the judge and attorneys, and, to aCaputo’s labor to proceed and her to give birth
surprising extent, the trial itself) seemed to encouragenaturally.
a spirit of open, even friendly, inquiry into the importantCitrin later addressed an issue that I had asked about
issues.during jury selection. In court, witnesses and
New York State residents are permitted to postponeNicholas’s medical records confirmed my
reporting for jury service up to three times before theconjecture that at no time in the child’s life
law requires them to report. I had already used allbefore age five (his age at the time of the trial), had he
three of my postponements and was fairly certain thatever been given any kind of diagnostic tests that might
I would end up on a jury this time. Considering thehave revealed brain damage sustained at birth or later.
reputation of medical malpractice cases as examplesAlthough this is neither illegal nor abusive, this simple
of “jackpot justice,” and my skepticalfact made Caputo seem neglectful of her son’s
views about trial lawyers, I expected to see the civilinterests.
justice system at its worst.Caputo testified that, when Nicholas was about two
Trial lawyers are often associated with words likeyears old, she began to notice that he might be
ambulance-chaser, shark, and predator—anddelayed in achieving normal developmental milestones
those middle-of-the-night TV commercials that urge usin a few areas. She was working and carried
to sue someone. In response, the American Trialadequate health insurance for herself and Nicholas, but
Lawyers Association embarked on an ambitiousshe never had him tested—no CAT scans,
image improvement campaign. In 2006, it changed itsMRIs, or EEGs had ever been taken. The law firm
name to the American Association for Justice. And itrepresenting the Caputos sent Nicholas for an EEG in
dropped the term trial lawyer altogether, replacing itpreparation for this trial and ordered competency tests
with civil practice attorney.to show the extent of Nicholas’s developmental
“Med-mal” is a prime example of how thedeficits. He now attends a special education program
reputation of civil practice lawyers has deteriorated.at a New York City public school.
They are often blamed for causing juries to wronglyWhatever these tests showed, there were no earlier
side against doctors on the question of medicalbaseline data to compare them against. For me, that
negligence and to award more in damages thanwas the deciding point, and Citrin had framed it very
justice requires. But this reputation may be a bad rap.clearly for the jury. Once our deliberations began, we
“Doctors & Juries,” a 2007 article inquickly agreed overall that the plaintiffs hadn’t
the Michigan Law Review reported thatconvinced us, especially regarding negligence. We
“Although juries are widely believed to be biasedawarded no monetary compensation.
against physicians, patients lose twice as manyWe worried about the impact that our verdict might
medical malpractice verdicts as they win.” Thehave on Nicholas, who came into court briefly during
article compared studies of cases that resulted in jurythe trial. He was a physically healthy child with long,
verdicts and evaluations of the same facts by one orcurly hair and a pleasant manner. He waved and
more physicians. The analytical methods of the studiessmiled at the jury members. As a father of three, I
differed, but the comparisons showed surprisingcould not help but feel compassion for Nicholas and his
similarities: plaintiffs won about 10 to 20 percent of themother. All of the jurors felt the same way: we were
cases with weak evidence of negligence and 50concerned about what the future might hold for them.
percent of the cases with strong evidence.However, we were told after the trial by the presiding
Marc J. Citrin is a prime example of why the reputationjudge, New York State Supreme Court Justice Roger
of trial lawyers may be undeserved. Citrin is a seniorN. Rosengarten, that to reach a mutually acceptable
partner with the New York firm of Shaub, Ahmuty,financial settlement, Citrin had offered Langell what is
Citrin & Spratt, which specializes in professionalknown as a “high/low agreement.” In a
liability defense and hospital and health care law.high/low agreement, the low figure sets a minimum
When my turn came to be interviewed for the Caputoamount that a plaintiff is assured of receiving. The high
v. Doctors Wallace and Stern and Long Island Jewishfigure is the maximum amount the plaintiff stands to
Medical Center jury, I was astonished that Citrin, thegain, regardless of what a jury decides. In effect, this
defense lawyer in this case, encouraged me to ask allagreement puts the financial outcome of a civil trial
the questions I could think of—and continued tobeyond the jury’s control. Why did Citrin believe
talk with me after the jury interviews ended. Iit was necessary to offer the high/low?
appreciated that he took my concerns seriously and“If we lost and had to pay compensation, all or
answered to the best of his ability. When hemost of Dr. Stern’s personal assets, including
didn’t have a good answer or didn’ther house, could have been taken away from her. LIJ
know the answer, he said so.was not subject to the high/low, so she would have
In complex matters like medical malpractice, Citrin triesbeen the only one held financially liable. I wanted to
to find jurors who will be able to follow the argumentsprotect Dr. Stern’s personal assets.”
and decide the case with their heads rather than theirIt’s easy to understand why Langell accepted
hearts. In selecting this jury, Citrin looked for workingthe offer: “We might have gone home
people. “They know how to assumeempty-handed. I could not let that happen if there was
responsibility. I also want educated people becausean alternative,” Langell said after the close of
they ask a lot of questions,” he says.the trial. Caputo, who had originally sought a million
Defending doctors accused of malpractice is one ofdollars, accepted $600,000 under the agreement.
Citrin’s specialties. “I like defending doctors.Neither she nor Langell agreed to be interviewed for
They try to do the right things for the rightthis article despite repeated requests.
reasons,” he says. “I have a deep-seated“Caputo was the type of case where the facts
belief in the position that I am advocating. “I try tocould have supported either side,” Justice
be open and honest with juries and provide all of theRosengarten says. A verdict had the potential for
information necessary for them to reach theplaintiffs to go home with nothing or for defendants to
conclusion that I want them to reach.”pay a much larger amount in compensation than they
Toni Ann Caputo sued her obstetrician, Dr. Francesexpected. Mr. Citrin’s offer of the high-low
Stern, a senior attending physician at Long Islandserved the interests of both sides. I’m glad that
Jewish Medical Center (LIJ), and the hospital’sthey were able to reach an agreement.”
labor and delivery staff, alleging that they had deviatedMedical malpractice remains a politically sensitive issue.
from accepted medical practice in the management ofThere are some indications that the Barack Obama
her labor and delivery. (Dr. Wallace was separatedpresidency might create a very different arena for
from the case before trial because she had haddeciding medical malpractice cases. Obama
minimal contact with Caputo.) The suit allegedcoauthored an article in 2006 with Hillary Clinton for the
negligence because Stern and LIJ staff did notNew England Journal of Medicine, titled “Making
perform an emergency Cesarean section delivery inPatient Safety the Centerpiece of Medical Liability
response to what the plaintiffs said was severe fetalReform.” The article recommended an
distress.alternative dispute resolution mechanism, which could
Her lawyer, John Langell, at the time with New Yorkradically change or eliminate the current litigation-based
City medical malpractice firm Fitzgerald &civil tort system.
Fitzgerald, argued that the baby was in severeObama and Clinton favored a nonbinding process by
distress due to repeated “variablewhich physicians could confidentially accept
decelerations” shown on the fetal heart monitor.responsibility for medical errors in exchange for an
Variable decelerations are temporary decreases in aoffer of “fair compensation” and the
baby’s heart rate caused when the babypatient’s promise not to sue. However, if the
presses on the umbilical cord. Langell said that the cordresult is nonbinding, the parties could still try their case in
compression causeda civil court. Predictably, opinion is divided—some
“hypoxia”—deprivation of oxygenlegal experts see the change as necessary because
to the brain—resulting in brain damage andthe current system has become too expensive and
permanent developmental delays. Caputo soughttime-consuming. Civil practice lawyers and judges are
monetary compensation of $1 million on thegenerally against it: they believe that it would be
baby’s behalf.anti-democratic to deny plaintiffs their day in court.
Nicholas, born with the umbilical cord wrapped twice